By Helen Mancini
The Supreme Court’s EPA vs. West Virginia ruling was expected news for most Americans concerned with US climate policy. The week before, every environmental activism group and media outlet flooded social media feeds with headlines precidicting, correctly, that the conservative court would restrict the EPA from regulating the greenhouse gas emissions of power plants. But, in such a fast moving digital world, headlines quickly shifted before many people could grasp a deeper understanding of the ruling once it passed. Much of the climate movement is made up by young people, who, at the time, may have been too busy with school finals and the start of summer plans to learn more about the case. The legal jargon, too, may have deterred young people from gaining a deeper unders...